Samuel Butler's Sheep

By 1840, it was clear that the industries that had first brought Europeans to New Zealand, particularly sealing and shore whaling, were faltering. In their place settlers were turning to a new primary export, wool: the commodity upon which Britain's industrial revolution and economic hegemony were based at the time. As James Belich writes, the ‘powered mills and factory-production techniques’ of Britain were ‘clothing and blanketing a good part of the world’, and as the empire expanded so did its pastures: to the Indian Subcontinent, South Africa, Australia and eventually New Zealand. During the 1830s and 1840s, Australian merinos were brought across the Tasman in large numbers, but breeding within New Zealand soon took over. There were over a million sheep in the country by 1860, 13 million by 1880, 20 million by the end of the century.1During the 1850s and 1860s, the ready availability of ‘free land, free grass and a large local market could mean staggering profits for those first in. “Sheep farming”, observed the Otago Witness in the 1850s, “‘presents visions of quite dazzling wealth’”.2Among the British immigrants who took advantage of this boom was the young Samuel Butler. During his four years on a Canterbury sheep run from 1860 to 1864, Butler ‘doubled his £4000 capital […], which helped make up for the paltry £69 3s 10d he received in royalties from his famous book Erewhon’.3 Of course, Erewhon (1872) and Erewhon Revisted (1901) were themselves products of Butler's time in New Zealand. Like Butler's own emigration – which he describes first-hand in the autobiographical First Year in Canterbury Settlement (1863) – the emigration of George Higgs, the narrator of Erewhon, derives from the entrepreneurial promise of imperial pastoralism: ‘when I left home it was with the intention of going to some new colony, and either finding, or even perhaps purchasing, waste crown land suitable for cattle or sheep farming, by which means I thought that I could better my fortunes more rapidly than in England’.4Reaching an unnamed settlement on the other side of the globe, Higgs describes the prospect he encounters as Nature's own invitation to the pastoralist: ‘millions on millions of acres of the most beautifully grassed country in the world, and of the best suited for all manner of sheep and cattle’ (p. 3). This description, based on 1860s Canterbury, ignores the strenuous labour by which human beings had constructed this agrarian idyll: the cutting or burning of the podocarp forest, the draining of the wetlands that originally covered the plains, the introduction of European grasses.5 By the time Butler reached Port Lyttelton in 1860, settlers had taken the readily accessible land in Canterbury. Seeking further inland and on higher ground than had his predecessors, Butler eventually found free pastureland in the upper valley of the Rangitata River. Higgs, faced by the same lack of ‘waste’ land, repeats Butler's journey of exploration. The first five chapters of Erewhon are thus based on Butler's own quest, including his discovery (in the company of his friend John Holland Baker) of the Whitcombe Pass.6In transforming his experience into satirical fiction, however, Butler dissects the colonial enterprise that drove settlers like him; for Butler, British imperialism consists of three distinct but co-operating forms. The first of these is aesthetic pastoralism, the evocation of Arcadia. Originating in antiquity, this trope gained a renewed life in eighteenth-century Britain, where its characteristic features – the amorous adventures of shepherds and shepherdesses, set amidst an idyllically fertile landscape of fruiting trees and gentle livestock – fulfilled several different cultural functions. On the one hand, aesthetic pastoralism provided a compensatory fantasy for an increasingly urbanized population separated from rural life. It served as a satirical counterpoint to metropolitan values and an idealization of the agricultural industry upon which British dominance depended. On the other hand, as John Andrews suggests, neo-classical Arcadianism helped mythologize and celebrate the necessary outsourcing of British agricultural production during the nineteenth century.7Entrepreneurs of colonialism, such as Edward Gibbon Wakefield, drew on the fertile landscapes and utopian social relations of the Arcadian tradition to promote their plans for settlement to prospective emigrants.8 The second form of pastoralism anatomized by Butler is the capitalist and agricultural practice of sheep-farming, the real-life investment of labour and money in livestock and land for profit. In the early chapters of Erewhon, Higgs's outlook alternates between Arcadian and mercenary impulses. At one moment he responds to a new vista with the kind of descriptive rhapsody – a valley ‘blue with evening shadow’, a hillside ‘brilliant with the sunset gold’, a river ‘boisterous and terrible’, a climate of ‘ineffable purity’, a region of ‘solemn peacefulness’ – that was familiar to Victorians as the stuff of the Arcadian picturesque (p. 17). The next moment he dismisses the landscape as ‘nothing but a few flats covered with scrub on either side the river, and mountains which were perfectly worthless’. Higgs's aesthetic appreciation quickly fades when it is not accompanied by the promise of economic reward: ‘my curiosity about the nature of the country above the gorge was now quite satisfied’, he declares, since ‘there was no available sheep country’ and hence ‘no money in it whatever’ (p. 21). This attitude reflects Butler's knowledge of the disposition of actual pastoralists, which he expresses in First Year: ‘our motive was pounds, shillings, and pence: and where this failed us, we lost all excitement and curiosity’.9A little later in the same volume Butler reprimands himself for ‘admiring a mountain which is of no use for sheep. This is wrong. A mountain here is only beautiful if it has good grass on it […]. If it is good for sheep, it is beautiful, magnificent, and all the rest of it; if not, it is not worth looking at’.10In Erewhon, similarly, aesthetic inspiration and capitalist aspiration sometimes meet to produce a heightened effect, for example when Higgs, on the verge of defeat, sees the clouds part to reveal ‘an easy pass in the mountains directly opposite to me, through which I caught a glimpse of an immeasurable extent of blue and distant plains’. The vanishing-point composition of this scene – which Butler, an accomplished painter, borrows from the tradition of perspectival landscape painting – parallels the profit motive, drawing the imagination of the reader into the distance just as Higgs resolves to continue, despite exhaustion and danger, in ‘the hope of finding an immense tract of available sheep country’ that he can ‘monopolise’ and ‘grasp at the possible profits therefrom’ (pp. 26–28). Bathetically, though, and unlike Butler himself, Higgs never achieves his quest, for the territory over the range is already occupied by a pastoral society. Erewhon is ‘a land of shepherds’ on the Arcadian model: a ‘highly cultivated’ landscape of towns, cities, villages, orchards, pine forests and plains. The first humans he meets are ‘two lovely girls’ tending their flock, nubile shepherdesses straight out of a pastoral idyll; the first house he visits resembles ‘a shepherd's hut upon [his] master's sheep-run’; his first meal is milk and mutton (pp. 42, 48–49, 54). Instead of an area of ‘waste’ land from which he can make his fortune, Higgs has discovered a mirror-image of the pastoral fantasy that shapes the settlement he has left behind. It seems he cannot go beyond the reach of the pastoral economy. Even his subsequent departure from Erewhon and return to Britain are bound up with it: accompanied by his love-interest, Arowhena, Higgs escapes Erewhon in a hot-air balloon that lands in the ocean, to be rescued by a ship en route from Calloa to Genoa with a cargo of guano, and transferred thence to ‘an English vessel bound from Melbourne to London with wool’ (pp. 314–15). Guano, used for fertiliser, was a crucial raw material for nineteenth-century sheep-farming, and wool was of course one of its two primary products.11 The final chapter of Erewhon brings into focus the third form of pastoralism that combines with the aesthetic and agricultural forms. Higgs announces his intention to form an association and raise capital for a navy of armed vessels to transport cargoes of Erewhonians – ‘packed closely and fed at a very reasonable cost’ – to Queensland, where they will be sold under indenture to ‘the sugar-growers of that settlement, who are in great want of labour’ (pp. 318–20). Modestly, Higgs acknowledges this scheme is inspired by a real article in The Times in which the Governor of Queensland attempts ‘to set at rest an uneasy feeling which at present existed in the country’ regarding the importation by that colony of indentured labourers from Polynesia by pointing out that their detention allows them to be given ‘religious instruction’ (pp.321–22).12In the same way, Higgs assures prospective investors that the Erewhonian labourers will be ‘lodged in the households of religious sugar-growers’ so that ‘each day, as soon as they could be spared from their work in the plantations, they would be assembled for praise, and be thoroughly grounded in the Church Catechism’. Higgs's scheme will ‘convert the Erewhonians not only into good Christians but into a source of considerable profit to the shareholders’, who will have ‘the comfort of reflecting that they [are] saving souls and filling their own pockets at one and the same moment’ (pp. 320–21). In the familiar symbolic language of the Gospel parable, the Erewhonians are lost sheep to be gathered into the fold; in the more pragmatic argot of the market, they are stock to be fleeced. This association between the mission of the pastor and that of the pastoralist, between the pastoral ambitions of Christian evangelism and those of agricultural capitalism, recalls the parodic sacrament enacted at the start of the journey to Erewhon by Higgs and his native guide Chowbok, which makes use of wool bales and sheep-tallow candles and takes place in a wool-shed ‘built somewhat on the same plan as a cathedral’ (pp. 11–12). This sardonic portrayal of Christian evangelism, the third form of ‘pastoral work’ satirized in Erewhon, is infused not only with Butler's longstanding hostility to organised religion, but also with his awareness that the systematic colonization of the Canterbury district involved a carefully organized collaboration between the New Zealand Company and the Church of England.13 Concluding Erewhon with these references to ‘blackbirding’ (forced indenture) in the Pacific reinforces the point that agricultural colonialism is not a benign realization of Arcadian and Christian ideals but a project entailing the large-scale dispossession, transformation and exploitation of humans, as well as of animals and ecosystems. Higgs's of this scheme of course, the reader have had in his or in the values and by in Higgs is as an narrator point of is not just a for the social but also a of it – a satirical in which can and It is crucial to this when about and nature more are in In of the three of pastoralism the of and of sheep in to be economic or In aesthetic pastoralism sheep are to the Arcadian idyll; in agricultural pastoralism they are of in religious pastoralism they the souls of the It is though, that when Butler a and of Erewhon in he to two chapters that on the of the of animals have or beyond their use by human and the most have to these chapters as to the and of want to however, that the material in these chapters to Butler's to his project in Erewhon, and to his with his and social In the first these two chapters a to one of the of the time. about and and were in This was the moment at which was its as the form of and one of the of to the of (in and industrial (in British and of the about these so it is no that Butler, a could be found in the – the and about – as well as the and such the an for Butler as he to his In the first of the the chapters set in Erewhon were to a of those that social with and in Erewhon, is are is as an and as a these chapters the sometimes the of is the Erewhonian at other it is Higgs's and it is the of and to or This to the two chapters to Erewhon in with At first these new chapters to be of and The first of an Erewhonian the of from the satirical of the by its the of the Erewhonians ‘to up at the of and to be by the by and As a the chapter the in of a who it into his to himself about the of animals – a that so had This that and are that from in some these are and those that they have in with are and and that since it is of to and it is also to and and narrator directly this by the as a an at the who to his The as the of his that his from an who has himself to further as a of the same that Erewhon also in (pp. The of the are no the of animals for is it to animals who ‘a those who and those Erewhonian animals to under more or even such for the most part as sheep and who a to out a and run up In including and to their with such that it necessary to them to a (pp. In as the livestock the Erewhonians a kind of to the on the of as a – a Higgs reinforces by with a about the and of young himself and and his he to or no by this the young in which was The more he the he in but the more in the of and to but the of for the out of the with a of mutton about his to and he takes his own life (pp. The chapter thus the satirical in and In its of of and of the chapter seems to with the of the is a and Butler for a more so it as we the second of the two chapters in the of the in and in the of Butler's time and the of his these two chapters reveal a more of and of than is at first As Butler to not just the of the Erewhonians but also those of his own even when in the Higgs seems most of his This is in the second of the new but it in quite a This of an Erewhonian the of seems at first with the one in its of since it the of Erewhonian who as an of the that be from exploitation by This is a to by Butler the to his own satirical practice by that the of who the of not his own in a great had no other end in than the to an (p. This in other in for the of on the – which the reader it seems is to – that they a the of human beings and to By use of the or the between and between and and between thought and for to the by to themselves their make the most […], their with like those of a with by in and so as to even their with to and them to themselves in which they have of their and with on the other hand, they that can be of to they make is to be if to to one to and to it is not to be (pp. This to of the a particularly form of the one that nineteenth-century and industrial to be the to human and over other the to produce for a range of and of As he from this Higgs that it have inspired some of the in The of the the more Erewhonian tract in The of that book – which over the Erewhonian attitude to – the of the about by that animals and of that cannot be from human this on the of to their own by The of the to a as and that of a is of a and is a as as an is the makes the in but it is makes of for but the is not more of a than the (pp. only are beings the for they are also the to make to the of a which on a but ignores the of a or a of the of The of the it is so a have such a to its own If this is where is the use of on to the with the of to the human pastoral it seems to that the and a it not to the that a and a sheep (p. these chapters makes it that they are not with or at Butler here his Erewhonian to a to the between and these his to the that the of nature – including animals and human beings – is by of and the of the Erewhonian at their most with those of Butler himself Butler was a and he makes this In the to the of Erewhon he that in – the chapter on the of – he has the of an Erewhonian a originally in his own – a as he to be quite (p. in Erewhon regarding animals and are at and with in Butler's four on and and New and or the Erewhonian of repeats from a Butler in and in and Butler's to Erewhon in from the most and of satirical a kind of The to Butler's own is not that the Erewhonian of that of the narrator Higgs and the Erewhonians who with the that of the who to from but is Butler's with the of the that of to and life – the most of as it is by no one in the not even the who This reflects the of the By on the of nature Butler was a of At the of the on in animals and on which the second of the chapters to Erewhon Butler his in of ‘the of and of a but the kind as and and that are that this is the very point which the of the most Butler these by the of thought – as he it to it from the of which he – and by Butler, of – are and on if they to the and – all life to a In of that during its to the it makes in of its and – the of a from a of for the of a as it further and encounters – and that these are and further by its and This Butler he of the of and in the and the Even at the time he was though, it was clear Butler was a of had already into to a lack of and the of would it with the of even if Butler's has not of his on now to quite of of and at work animals and can be as in would be a of the two of and have the that human and are the or at most that between and the rest of the have that the by other including as well as and cultural to these from the between of – which means in this the to make This makes it possible to of the of animals or other to that such or It also allows of human own or – which are more and than and In this the of which has over the world, is with a of as a and Samuel Butler's on the of the world, and his of the between and can be as attempts to a of – even though, the in thought and that would in the he had to on and who who and who make This of of Butler's his he it into the chapter of the these of also his and on thought and in form in the he in the during his time in New Zealand, which he later for in the and he during his time as a – which were gathered and by his as A Year in Canterbury Settlement – are by the of in here he his in a more and Butler's sheep – his actual sheep – were from the or of the On the Butler that the only hope of with them on with them in their own to a of sheep across a river, he the first a from the and at them out and to their and raise all the about their that In of all that can they will very through and make First the on the and of the sheep is with a transformation of the human into If these at though, eventually ‘a sheep will be the opposite and an to At this point the humans can but this to its a moment that not a so to be the sheep with three or four into is and thence on to the opposite the in a of their own and will be no more from the moment when the first sheep the experience as a in New Zealand that the between humans and nature is a of in which from a of and the of a the social will of the the of human that like the of the the and of the and the by the of or and to the sheep. As James has Butler in New Zealand was not a of pastoralism and but a in which was with and a place that a of the between and human in these Butler out that humans are not of nature who on a and of This is a for several it in the of the most and of it so the of and it most on collaboration with that most of New – the sheep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.