MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966760252 · doi:10.1142/s1005386711000101

On Duo Group Rings

2011· article· en· W1966760252 on OpenAlexaff
Weidong Gao, Yuanlin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgebra Colloquium · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsIntegral domainGroup ringRing (chemistry)QuotientGroup (periodic table)Ring of integersOrder (exchange)Torsion (gastropod)Quotient ringField (mathematics)Pure mathematicsAlgebraic numberBrauer groupZero (linguistics)Global fieldAlgebraic number fieldCombinatoricsMathematical analysisCommutative ring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown that if the group ring RQ8 of the quaternion group Q8 of order 8 over an integral domain R is duo, then R is a field for the following cases: (1) char R ≠ 0, and (2) char R = 0 and S ⊆ R ⊆ KS, where S is a ring of algebraic integers and KS is its quotient field. Hence, we confirm that the field ℚ of rational numbers is the smallest integral domain R of characteristic zero such that RQ8 is duo. A non-field integral domain R of characteristic zero for which RQ8 is duo is also identified. Moreover, we give a description of when the group ring RG of a torsion group G is duo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlgebra ColloquiumSame topicRings, Modules, and AlgebrasFrench-language works237,207