MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967067107 · doi:10.1177/1534765608323441

Effects of traumatic stress on firefighters' world assumptions.

2008· article· en· W1967067107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraumatology An International Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChecklistMental healthPsychologyClinical psychologyScale (ratio)Occupational safety and healthService workerPsychiatryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

on world assumptions related to traumatic exposure in other situations (i.e., those who may, or may not, be directly affected but nonetheless experience the event; see, e.g., Buchanan, Anderson, Uhlemann, & Horwitz, 2006). In particular, the construct of world assumptions has yet to be considered with first responders, an explicit population of workers regu-larly exposed to traumatic events. There is anecdotal literature that focuses on the stress reactions of emergency workers and suggests that the most common reactions to stress are men-tal health problems, alcohol and drug abuse, depres-sion, and anxiety (see, e.g., Dernocoeur, 1995; Powell, 1995). Alternatively, to our knowledge, there is no current literature that has addressed the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it