MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967219124 · doi:10.1145/1504347.1504364

Unified formulas for arbitrary order symbolic derivatives and anti-derivatives of the power-inverse hyperbolic class 1

2009· article· en· W1967219124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM communications in computer algebra · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFunctional Equations Stability Results
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHyperbolic functionInverseOrder (exchange)Pure mathematicsInverse functionFunction (biology)Integer (computer science)Class (philosophy)Inverse trigonometric functionsDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We continue on tackling and giving a complete solution to the problem of finding the nth derivative and the nth anti-derivative, where n can be an integer, a fraction, a real, or a symbol, of elementary and special classes of functions. In general, the solutions are given through unified formulas in terms of the Fox H-function which in many cases can be simplified to less general functions. In this work, we consider two subclasses of the power-inverse hyperbolic class. Namely, the power-inverse hyperbolic sine class { f ( x ) : f ( x ) = Σ l j =1 Pj ( x α j )arcsinh(β j x γ j ), α j ∈ C, β j ∈ C\{0},γ j ∈ R\{0}, (1) and the power-inverse hyperbolic cosine class { f ( x ) : f ( x ) = Σ l j =1 Pj ( x α j )arccosh(β j x γ j ), α j ∈ C, β j ∈ C\{0},γ j ∈ R\{0}, (2) where pj's are polynomials of certain degrees. One of the key points in this work is that the approach does not depend on integration techniques The arbitrary order of differentiation is found according to the Riemann-Liouville definition, whereas the generalized Cauchy n-fold integral is adopted for arbitrary order of integration. The motivation of this work comes from the area of symbolic computation. The idea is that: Given a function f in a variable x , can CAS find a formula for the n th derivative, the n th anti-derivative, or both of f ? This enhances the power of integration and differentiation of CAS. In Maple, the formulas correspond to invoking the commands diff( f ( x ) for the n th derivative and int( f ( x ), x$n ) for the n th anti-derivative. A software exhibition will be given using Maple. Example: A unified formula for arcsinh(√ x ) in terms of the Meijer G-function (arcsinh(√ x )) (n) = x (1/2-- n over2√π G 1,2 over 1,2 (1/2,1/2over0, n --1/2│ x ) , │ x │ < 1. (3). The above G-function reduces to the original function if n = 0. It gives derivatives of any order if n > 0 and anti-derivatives of any order if n < 0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it