MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Density‐dependent effects on tree survival in an old‐growth Douglas fir forest

2000· article· en· W1967516608 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest Service
FundersCanadian Forest ServiceU.S. Forest Service
KeywordsInterspecific competitionIntraspecific competitionTsugaWestern HemlockBiologyUnderstoryEcologyCompetition (biology)Douglas firBotanyCanopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary 1 We mapped the locations of live and dead trees in a large forest plot dominated by pioneer Douglas fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii ) with an understorey of the invading late‐successional species western hemlock ( Tsuga heterophylla ) and western red cedar ( Thuja plicata ) on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, to test for intra‐ and interspecific density‐dependent effects on tree survival. 2 We analysed both the spatial patterning of trees in the plot and the relationships between neighbourhood density and tree survival. We also examined the effects of additional variables (principally elevation) as covariates in our neighbourhood analyses. 3 Both the spatial and initial neighbourhood analyses suggested strong intra‐ and interspecific density‐dependent effects on tree survival. Douglas fir survival was significantly higher in less dense patches of conspecifics and non‐random tree death led to regularly spaced survivors, as expected from intraspecific competition. The significantly lower survival of western hemlock in denser patches of Douglas fir and the resulting negative spatial association between surviving trees of these two species were consistent with interspecific competition. 4 However, having controlled for the influence of elevation on tree survival (probably mediated by variation in soil moisture) in neighbourhood analyses, although the survival of the pioneer Douglas fir trees was still subject to strong density‐dependent effects, variation in its density in the overstorey no longer appeared to influence the survival of the invading late‐successional species. There was, however, evidence for asymmetric interspecific density dependence between the two late‐successional species since western hemlock mortality tended to be higher in denser patches of western red cedar. 5 Our results emphasize the importance of considering confounding factors in studies that seek evidence for density dependence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it