MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968041658 · doi:10.1089/end.2004.18.723

Second Prize: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Intravesical Agents for Ureteral Stent Symptoms after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy

2004· article· en· W1968041658 on OpenAlexaff
Darren Beiko, James Watterson, Bodo E. Knudsen, Linda Nott, Stephen E. Pautler, Gerald Brock, Hassan Razvi, John D. Denstedt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endourology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtracorporeal shockwave lithotripsyLithotripsyStentRandomized controlled trialSurgeryExtracorporealUrologyDouble blindExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ureteral stents are a significant source of pain and discomfort for many urologic patients. A novel approach to addressing this problem is the intravesical instillation of a selected pharmacologic agent after stent insertion. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of intravesical instillation of various agents in reducing ureteral stent-associated discomfort in patients requiring a stent after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind prospective trial, 42 patients were randomized to receive intravesical instillation of one of three agents (oxybutynin, alkalinized lidocaine, or ketorolac) or a control solution (0.9% sodium chloride) immediately after stent insertion at time of SWL. The four groups of patients were demographically similar. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected prospectively and analyzed statistically. The primary outcome measure was reduction in ureteral stent symptoms, and the secondary outcome measure was the safety of intravesical instillation of each agent through assessment of drug-related adverse events. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications, nor were there any serious side effects attributable to any of the intravesically instilled agents. There was a statistically significant decrease in stent-related discomfort at the 1-hour time point in the group of patients who received intravesical ketorolac compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical instillation represents a novel approach to the problem of ureteral stent-related discomfort. From our results, ketorolac appears to be the most effective intravesical agent in reducing stent-related patient discomfort, and we have established that intravesical instillation of ketorolac is safe in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EndourologySame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207