Role of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) in the regulation of gonadal differentiation in the gilthead seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been proposed that gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) plays an autocrine/paracrine regulatory role in mammalian and fish ovaries. The marine teleost gilthead seabream is an interesting model since, during the life span of the fish, gonadal tissues develop first as testes, which then regress allowing the development of ovarian follicles. Recent studies carried out in ovaries of the gilthead seabream have demonstrated that various GnRH transcripts as well as GnRH splicing variants are expressed. The mRNA level of several GnRH forms in the female and male areas of the switching gonad, and their possible role in this process, were further investigated. The results here reported show that sGnRH, cGnRH-II, and sbGnRH transcripts are locally expressed during gilthead seabream gonadal differentiation; the expression of the three GnRH forms was found to differ among the morphologically defined areas of the switching gonad, as demonstrated by applying reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), together with in situ hybridization, and semiquantitative PCR analyses. Moreover, the hypothesis that GnRH forms may regulate testicular regression via an apoptotic mechanism was investigated by analyzing the different areas of switching gonads for caspase-3 activity as a measure of apoptosis. Our results showed a marked increase of caspase-3 activity in the area corresponding to the regressing testes in which a significant decrease of testosterone production was also found. The present findings demonstrate that the changes in the endogenous GnRH transcripts could be related with the gonadal differentiation in gilthead seabream, and that exogenous GnRH plays a role by stimulating apoptosis in the degenerating testis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".