MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968432866 · doi:10.3749/canmin.48.5.1329

CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY AND GENESIS OF ORGANIC MINERALS: A REVIEW OF OXALATE AND POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON MINERALS

2010· review· en· W1968432866 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceFetzer Institute
KeywordsPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonOxalateChemistryCrystal chemistryEnvironmental chemistryHydrocarbonInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organic minerals are natural organic compounds with both a well-defined chemical composition and crystallographic properties; their occurrences reveal traces of the high concentration of certain organic compounds in natural environments. Thus the origin and process of formation of organic minerals will lead us to understand the fate and behavior of the organic molecules in the lithosphere. With the aim of their contribution to new developments in mineralogy, we subdivide organic minerals into two groups: (1) ionic organic minerals, in which organic anions and various cations are held together by ionic bonds, and (2) molecular organic minerals, in which electroneutral organic molecules are bonded by weak intermolecular interactions. This review is composed of four sections. The first section is concerned with the definition of both organic minerals and the above two groups. The second deals with crystal chemistry and geochemistry of oxalate minerals, which are the most typical ionic organic minerals. In this section, the role of (H 2 O) 0 is first discussed, as most oxalate minerals incorporate (H 2 O) 0 into their crystal structures. Then the phase relationships among hydrous and anhydrous calcium oxalate minerals, namely their structural hierarchy, are described, owing to the fact that they are the most abundant ionic organic minerals. In addition, the weak Jahn– Teller effect of the Fe 2+ ion is exemplified in humboldtine [Fe 2+ (C 2 O 4 )·2H 2 O]. The Fe 2+ ion causes distortions of octahedra in this organic mineral, though the effect has hardly been observed in inorganic minerals. In the third section, we describe the crystal chemistry and process of formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) minerals, which are the most typical molecular organic minerals. Those of karpatite (C 24 H 12 ) and idrialite (C 22 H 14 ) are particularly considered in detail. In the fourth section, we summarize the characteristics of organic minerals and discuss their contribution to Earth and planetary sciences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it