MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968511898 · doi:10.4043/18839-ms

Reverse-Circulation Cementing To Seal a Tight Liner Lap

2007· article· en· W1968511898 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsDevon Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnulus (botany)CasingLost circulationPetroleum engineeringDrillingDrillDrilling fluidDrill pipeGeologyWellboreEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Drilling in the Arctic can present a number of challenges even before the drilling begins. Among the challenges are logistic difficulties, weather extremes, and environmental sensitivities. To offset the production decline for natural gas in North America operators must confront these challenges by resuming exploration in the Arctic. The target in this case study is a well in the Paktoa field. The design challenge presented by this well was to drill the well to total depth (TD) with the lowest number of casing strings while avoiding remedial cementing operations. Given that the mud-weight window predicted for this wellbore was quite narrow, well planners determined that no fewer than five casing strings were needed to reach TD. Multiple casing strings can lead to tighter annuli and more challenging cementing operations. Using modeling software as an aid to cement design, planners determined that the cement on the first liner, from 1,300 to 2,600 ft, could not be circulated conventionally without breaking down the formation because of the high equivalent circulating density (ECD). The greatest contributor to the high ECD is the tight annulus of the liner lap. The model parameters were reversed and the model predicted that a reverse-circulation cementing (RCC) operation would be successful. RCC is a method of pumping cement down the annulus and receiving returns inside the casing. One advantage of reverse circulating is that the ECD is reduced and less pressure is exerted on the formation. This will help reduce or eliminate cement losses into weak formations. Placing the cement down the annulus appeared to be feasible with the computer model but to conduct the operation in the field, other challenges were addressed. In a reverse operation, the float valve is removed or sheared out before pumping cement. This is not of concern with a normal casing string but with a liner, the drillpipe is detached and the cement will drop until the pressure is balanced at the shoe. To prevent the cement drop, two flapper valves were installed such that the liner running tool and slick stinger could stab in and circulation could be established. The RCC operation on the liner was successfully conducted. This paper presents a case history of the reverse-circulation cementing operation. Background/Introduction The Beaufort Sea, located between Alaska and the Northwest Territories, is the focus of recent exploration, with Devon Canada returning to the Canadian Beaufort Sea to drill the first offshore well started since 1991. Using 3D seismic mapping technology, Devon has narrowed its emphasis to the Paktoa field, an area that indicated significant gas reserves. The drilling platform used by Devon was designed for Beaufort Sea drilling and christened in 1982; the SDC (steel drilling caisson) was built from the hull of a retired oil supertanker (Fig. 1). Since 2002, the SDC drilling rig has been in cold storage waiting for exploration to resume. The rig was refurbished, upgraded, and towed to its present location (during the summer months).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it