MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In vitro technique in estimation of passive mechanical properties of bovine heart: Part I. Experimental techniques and data

2008· article· en· W1968912899 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Engineering & Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVentricleViscoelasticityMaterials scienceHyperelastic materialBiomedical engineeringComposite materialStructural engineeringCardiologyFinite element methodMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myocardium generally demonstrates viscoelastic behavior. Since the stress-stain relationships of tissues are pseudo-elastic, their mechanical behavior can be defined as hyperelastic. In this work, mechanical properties of bovine heart were studied. In this study, the experimental technique for testing myocardium is explained and the experimental data are presented. First, the heart was perfused and the specimens were cut from different regions of the heart. Second, the materials preferred direction was identified. Then, a series of uniaxial, biaxial and equibiaxial test were performed on specimens taken from: left ventricle free wall (LVFW), right ventricle free wall (RVFW), left ventricle mid-wall (LVMW) and apex. Test specimens were preconditioned by applying cyclic load to reduce the viscoelastic effect. After preconditioning, the samples were tested at various stretch rates and loading conditions. Finally, a conclusion is made on the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it