MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969179982 · doi:10.4296/cwrj2502153

Climate Change Impacts on the Hydrology of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence System

2000· article· en· W1969179982 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Linda Mortsch, Henry Hengeveld, Murray Lister, Lisa Wenger, Brent M. Lofgren, Frank H. Quinn, Michel Slivitzky

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffEvapotranspirationPrecipitationGreenhouse gasDrainage basinGlobal warmingWater resourcesEffects of global warmingClimate modelHydrology (agriculture)Hydrological modellingClimatologyGeographyMeteorologyOceanographyEcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A review of the current state of knowledge on climate change due to an ’enhanced greenhouse effect’ and the response of the climate and hydrologic systems to a changing atmosphere is provided. In particular, the survey presents historic trends in and the impacts of climate change on temperature, precipitation, evapotranspiration, runoff and Great Lakes levels. While much of the impacts research in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence basin has used equilibrium 2 × CO2 scenarios, the transient scenarios for 2030 and 2050 from the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis and the United Kingdom Hadley Centre coupled atmosphere-ocean global circulation models are also described. If the significant declines in runoff and lakes levels suggested by climate change scenarios are realized, there could be serious supply-demand mismatches and water allocation issues. The issue of climate change reinforces the need for continued cooperative planning and management of the water resources of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations105
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207