MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fantasies of White Masculinity in Arthur Schnitzler's <i>Andreas Thameyers letzter Brief</i> (1900)

2011· article· en· W1969193678 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe German Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasculinityNovellaGender studiesColonialismLiteratureBourgeoisieSociologyHistoryArtPoliticsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the notion of masculinity in crisis has become a commonplace in fin‐de‐siècle literary studies, Schnitzler's novella Andreas Thameyers letzter Brief has thus far been investigated primarily with respect to the (pathological) psychology of its protagonist and the contemporary medical discourses surrounding the theme of “maternal impression.” This essay seeks to reframe the text, placing it within historical discourses on masculinity, the body, and heterosexuality, and their intersections with colonial discourses on race and whiteness. Such a reading illuminates the complex construction of and multiple threats to urban bourgeois masculinity, masculine hegemony and the control of women, and the influence of colonial discourses on this empire without colonies. Re‐contextualized within its historical discourses, the essay proposes that the novella needs to be understood as a damning indictment of white western masculinity in fin‐de‐siècle Austria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it