Race and the intimate in Arctic exploration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unused to pushing the affective up against the political we leave sentiments to literature, dismiss references to them as the emotive fluff rather than the real stuff of official archives. ANN LAURA STOLER This article discusses some of the complications of race and intimacy in the twentieth-century Canadian Arctic by focusing on anthropologist-explorer Vilhjalmur Stefansson (1879–1962). Unlike most Arctic explorers of his generation, Stefansson emphasized the importance of living among indigenous people, but he also represented an empire that was creating its own space abroad in competition with other empires for power and resources. Drawing upon recent anthropological and historical work on imperial regimes, the article reflects on similarities and differences between imperial politics and practices in the Arctic and other parts of the world. It argue that these differences – including the dependence of European males on Inuit women – must be kept in mind when discussing race, gender, and intimacy during the colonization of the Arctic. Moreover, any discussion of intimacy between guests and natives in the Arctic must also be attentive to Inuit notions of relatedness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it