MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969556115 · doi:10.1287/ijoc.1100.0435

Efficient and Reliable Computation of Birth-Death Process Performance Measures

2010· article· en· W1969556115 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS journal on computing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsArithmetic underflowPopulationAlgorithmBounded functionQueueing theoryComputationTruncation (statistics)Mathematical optimizationRange (aeronautics)Computer scienceApplied mathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an efficient, reliable, and easy-to-implement algorithm to compute steady-state probabilities for birth-death processes whose upper-tail probabilities decay geometrically or faster. The algorithm can provide any required accuracy and avoids over- and underflow. In addition to steady-state probabilities, the algorithm can compute any performance measure that can be expressed as the expected value of a function of the population size, for nonnegative functions that are bounded by a constant, linear, or quadratic function of population size. The algorithm works with conditional steady-state probabilities, given that the population is in a range that is extended up and down as the algorithm progresses. These conditional probabilities facilitate the derivation of truncation error bounds. We illustrate the application of the algorithm to the Erlang B, C, and A queueing systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it