MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970063402 · doi:10.1177/0276146710376835

Single- and Multi-Ideology Marketing in the Province of Quebec in the Early Twentieth Century

2010· article· en· W1970063402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Macromarketing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyNationalismContext (archaeology)Political sciencePopulationAdvertisingSociologyPoliticsLawBusinessHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the authors examine the marketing strategies that stove manufacturers implemented in the province of Quebec at the beginning of the twentieth century where the French and English Canadian nationalist ideologies coexisted. More specifically, the authors document evidence that a multi-ideology marketing framework mixing English and French Canadian nationalisms was used by French Canadian producers while English Canadian producers developed advertising campaigns exhibiting references to a single ideology. The analyses further suggest that the nationalist ideologies that producers tried to embed in stoves were consistent with their differentiation strategies. Overall, the authors conclude that advertising campaigns designed by members of a threatened ideological minority are more sensitive to all ideologies forming a population than are campaigns designed by members of an unthreatened ideological majority. More broadly, this study provides support for the widespread claim that the social context in which marketing is to occur ought to be taken into consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it