MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970139588 · doi:10.1109/bibe.2014.52

Detection and Removal of Muscle Artifacts from Scalp EEG Recordings in Patients with Epilepsy

2014· article· en· W1970139588 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyComputer scienceEpilepsyScalpPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceEEG-fMRISpeech recognitionNeurosciencePsychologyMedicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Electroencephalogram (EEG) is often contaminated by muscle artifacts. EEG is a widely used recording technique for the study of many brain related diseases such as epilepsy. The detection and removal of muscle artifacts from the EEG signal poses a real challenge and is crucial for the reliable interpretation of EEG-based quantitative measures. In this paper, an automatic method for detection and removal of muscle artifacts from scalp EEG recordings, based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA), is introduced. To this end we exploit the fact that the EEG signal may exhibit altered autocorrelation structure and spectral characteristics during periods when it is contaminated by muscle activity. Therefore, we design classifiers in order to automatically discriminate between contaminated and non-contaminated EEG epochs using features based on the aforementioned quantities and examine their performance on simulated data and in scalp EEG recordings obtained from patients with epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207