High-Gain Patch Antennas Loaded With High Characteristic Impedance Superstrates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is shown that, under some resonance conditions, a microstrip patch antenna can be designed to achieve the highest possible gain when covered with a superstrate at the proper distance in free space. The transmission line analogy and the cavity model are used to deduce the resonance conditions required to achieve the highest gain. The resonance conditions include the condition on spacing between the antenna's substrate and the superstrate and the thickness of the superstrate. The permeability and permittivity of the superstrate are determined based on these resonant lengths and the appropriate characteristic impedance of each layer in this multilayered structure. The results are verified using both analytical and numerical methods. The effect of anisotropy of the superstrate is numerically investigated. The design criteria proposed here will reduce the total profile of the radiating system by 50% when compared to previous trends.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it