MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970524486 · doi:10.2174/0929867033457340

Synthetic Vaccines: The Role of Adjuvants in Immune Targeting

2003· review· en· W1970524486 on OpenAlexaff
Zi‐Hua Jiang, R. Rao Koganty

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Medicinal Chemistry · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemAcquired immune systemInnate immune systemAdjuvantImmunityBiologyPattern recognition receptorPathogen-associated molecular patternImmunologyEpitopeAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A clear understanding of the mechanism of function of immune stimulatory adjuvants, which commonly accompany vaccines, is beginning to emerge. Recent investigations have demonstrated that Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are the critical link between the innate and the adaptive immunity. This link, which is normally activated as a result of collaboration between adjuvants and TLRs in triggering adaptive immunity, has been a subject of several recent investigations. With the advent of well-defined synthetic small molecules, which are designed to either mimic the adjuvants or, as in many cases, to structurally represent pathogen associated molecular patterns, it is now possible to design reproducible experiments and to draw credible conclusions. An adjuvant alerts the host immune system through a mechanism similar to that of an infection by a pathogen, which involves interaction with a TLR followed by a lsqou;danger signal' to the immune system. Secretion of cytokines and regulation of the expression of co-stimulatory molecules induced by innate response shape the magnitude and quality of adaptive response. Synthetic vaccines containing specific epitopes to which immune responses are desired, are expected to be far superior in target specificity while the benefits may be long-lasting. The immune responses by therapeutic vaccines are generally adaptive in nature and such responses often require the participation of the components of innate immunity, most importantly the TLRs and their pathogen-associated binding compliments. Structurally well-defined synthetic molecules derived from lipid A, muramyl di-peptide (MDP), and CpG motifs from bacterial DNA offer a wide range of immune stimulants for the development of fully synthetic vaccines. Lipo-peptide and self-adjuvanted antigens, in combination with additional immune stimulatory adjuvants in liposome delivery system, may be important in vaccine design. Combinations of synthetic mimics of microbial products are known to display synergistic effects in stimulating the immune system. Either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, innate immune therapy using TLR ligands to stimulate the immune system may offer an alternate therapeutic approach against rapidly mutating viral infections-(HIV/AIDS), and cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Medicinal ChemistrySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207