MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970841109 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2005.854412

Experimental verification of multidirectional multiscroll chaotic attractors

2006· article· en· W1970841109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttractorScrollChaoticTopology (electrical circuits)Function seriesCircuit diagramControl theory (sociology)PhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisElectronic engineeringEngineeringCombinatoricsArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A systematic methodology for circuit design is proposed for experimental verification of multidirectional multiscroll chaotic attractors, including one-directional (1-D) n-scroll, 2-D n/spl times/m-grid scroll, and 3-D n/spl times/m/spl times/l-grid scroll chaotic attractors. Two typical cases are investigated in detail: the hysteresis and saturated multiscroll chaotic attractors. A simple blocking circuit diagram is designed for experimentally verifying 1-D 5/spl sim/11-scroll, 2-D 3/spl times/5/spl sim/11-grid scroll, and 3-D 3/spl times/3/spl times/5/spl sim/11-grid scroll hysteresis chaotic attractors by manipulating the switchers. Moreover, a block circuitry is also designed for physically realizing 1-D 10, 12, 14-scroll, 2-D 10, 12, 14/spl times/10-grid scroll, and 3-D 10/spl times/10/spl times/10-grid scroll saturated chaotic attractors via switching. In addition, one can easily realize chaotic attractors with a desired odd number of scrolls by slightly modifying the corresponding voltage saturated function series of the circuit, to produce for instance a 1-D 13-scroll saturated chaotic attractor. This is the first time in the literature to report an experimental verification of a 1-D 14-scroll, a 2-D 14/spl times/10-grid scroll and a 3-D 10/spl times/10/spl times/10-grid (totally 1000) scroll chaotic attractors. Only the 3-D case is reported in detail for simplicity of presentation. It is well known that hardware implementation of 1-D n-scroll with n/spl ges/10, 2-D n/spl times/m-grid scroll with n,m/spl ges/10, and 3-D n/spl times/m/spl times/l-grid scroll with n,m,l/spl ges/10 chaotic attractors is very difficult technically, signifying the novelty and significance of the achievements reported in this paper. Finally, this circuit design approach provides some principles and guidelines for hardware implementation of chaotic attractors with a multidirectional orientation and with a large number of scrolls, useful for future circuitry design and engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it