MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970854404 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1378223

Calculation of loss probability in a partitioned buffer with self-similar input traffic

2005· article· en· W1970854404 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPacket lossComputer scienceHeuristicBuffer overflowClass (philosophy)Buffer (optical fiber)Fractional Brownian motionRange (aeronautics)ProvisioningAlgorithmNetwork packetMathematical optimizationBrownian motionComputer networkMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the differentiated services model, provisioning quantitative assured services is a challenging topic, as it requires loss probability calculation for a partitioned buffer. In this paper, we study such a loss analysis problem with self-similar input traffic, which has never been studied in the open literature. The input is modeled as a fractional Brownian motion process including J classes of traffic. Each class has its unique requirement on packet loss probability. A first-in-first-out buffer partitioned with J-1 thresholds is used to provide J loss priorities. Heuristic expressions of the loss probabilities for all the J classes are derived, and simulation results demonstrate that the heuristic expressions provide an accurate estimate for all the loss probabilities over the entire buffer range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207