Impact of CSR Perception on Brand Image, Brand Attitude and Buying Willingness: A Study of a Global Café
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been the subject of increasing public scrutiny, and consumers have become more concerned about whether enterprises are contributing to the betterment of society. This research takes Starbucks as an example in the exploration of the impact of different generations' perceptions of CSR on future buying willingness. The research survey collected 624 validated questionnaires. The results show that different generations have significantly different attitudes in two influential ways: (1) in the X-generation, the influence of environmental CSR on experiential brand image, and the influence of brand attitude on future buying willingness, are more significant than with the Y-generation; (2) in the Y-generation, the impact of community CSR on experiential brand image, and the impact of symbolic brand awareness on brand attitude are more significant than with the X-generation. The research found that a business undertaking a successful policy of CSR could lead consumers to purchase its products. Ultimately the business will have an opportunity to fulfill its goal of sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it