MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971650774 · doi:10.1137/s0097539702415950

Counting Complexity Classes for Numeric Computations I: Semilinear Sets

2003· article· en· W1971650774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Computing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBetti numberComplexity classCompleteness (order theory)ComputationMathematicsClass (philosophy)Discrete mathematicsCharacterization (materials science)Counting problemEuler's formulaEuler characteristicCombinatoricsModel of computationTransfer (computing)Computational complexity theoryTime complexityAlgorithmComputer sciencePhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We define a counting class ${\rm #P}_\add$ in the Blum--Shub--Smale setting of additive computations over the reals. Structural properties of this class are studied, including a characterization in terms of the classical counting class $#{\sf P}$ introduced by Valiant. We also establish transfer theorems for both directions between the real additive and the discrete setting. Then we characterize in terms of completeness results the complexity of computing basic topological invariants of semilinear sets given by additive circuits. It turns out that the computation of the Euler characteristic is ${\rm FP}_{\rm add}^{{\rm #P}_{\rm add}}$-complete, while for fixed k the computation of the kth Betti number is ${\rm FPAR}_{\rm add}$-complete. Thus the latter is more difficult under standard complexity theoretic assumptions. We use all of the above to prove some analogous completeness results in the classical setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it