MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971684295 · doi:10.1109/wosspa.2013.6602411

Adaptation of bit recycling to arithmetic coding

2013· article· en· W1971684295 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHuffman codingArithmetic codingComputer scienceData compressionRedundancy (engineering)ArithmeticContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingCoding (social sciences)Lossless compressionAdaptation (eye)Compression ratioEncoding (memory)AlgorithmParallel computingTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bit recycling compression technique has been introduced to minimize the redundancy caused by the multiplicity of encoding feature present in many compression techniques. It has achieved about 9% as a reduction in the size of the files compressed by Gzip. In this paper, we propose to adapt bit recycling to arithmetic code instead of Huffman code. This adaptation enables bit recycling to achieve better compression and a much wider applicability. A theoretical analysis that estimates the average amount of data compression that can be achieved by this adaptation is presented as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207