MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971692157 · doi:10.1680/envgeo.13.00025

Settlement behaviour of a soil due to artificial tree roots

2014· article· en· W1971692157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Geotechnics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodGeotechnical engineeringSoil waterDeformation (meteorology)Settlement (finance)SuctionElasticity (physics)Soil mechanicsGeologySoil scienceEnvironmental scienceStructural engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialMechanical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents experimental and finite element analysis (FEA) results with respect to the deformation behaviour of a sandy soil associated with an artificial rooting system. The mechanics of unsaturated soils is used as a tool in the interpretation of the results. The modulus of elasticity, H, associated with the matric suction was measured and used as a key input parameter in the FEA along with the soil–water characteristic curve. The FEA was carried out using the commercial finite element software SEEP/W and SIGMA/W. Comparisons are provided between the measured deformation and that predicted from the FEA. A reasonably good agreement is observed between the measured and predicted deformation behaviour. The study shows that the proposed FEA technique can be used as a tool to estimate the deformation behaviour in soils associated with tree-roots suction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it