MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971729261 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-07-04125-6

An analogue of the Descartes-Euler formula for infinite graphs and Higuchi’s conjecture

2007· article· en· W1971729261 on OpenAlexaff
Matt DeVos, Bojan Mohar

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersMinistrstvo za Izobraževanje, Znanost in Šport
KeywordsMathematicsConjectureEuler's formulaCombinatoricsEuler characteristicPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be a connected 2-manifold without boundary obtained from a (possibly infinite) collection of polygons by identifying them along edges of equal length. Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper V"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">V</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be the set of vertices, and for every <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="v element-of upper V"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ∈ </mml:mo> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">v \in V</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="kappa left-parenthesis v right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi> κ </mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\kappa (v)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> denote the (Gaussian) curvature of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="v"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">v</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> : <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="2 pi"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi> π </mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">2 \pi</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> minus the sum of incident polygon angles. Descartes showed that <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="sigma-summation Underscript v element-of upper V Endscripts kappa left-parenthesis v right-parenthesis equals 4 pi"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:munder> <mml:mo> ∑ </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ∈ </mml:mo> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:mi> κ </mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mi> π </mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\sum _{v \in V} \kappa (v) = 4 \pi</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> whenever <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> may be realized as the surface of a convex polytope in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper R cubed"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {R}^3</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . More generally, if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is made of finitely many polygons, Euler’s formula is equivalent to the equation <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="sigma-summation Underscript v element-of upper V Endscripts kappa left-parenthesis v right-parenthesis equals 2 pi chi left-parenthesis script upper R right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:munder> <mml:mo> ∑ </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ∈ </mml:mo> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:mi> κ </mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi> π </mml:mi> <mml:mi> χ </mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD">

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207