Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Executive–legislative relations in Canada have long favoured prime ministers with strong legislative powers even by Westminster standards, although these are tempered by federalism and entrenched constitutional rights. Parliamentary parties are highly disciplined and defeats of government bills are virtually unknown. While parliamentary scrutiny of government is well established, its parameters and actual effectiveness are blurry. The appointed Senate can serve as a counterweight to executive power but it lacks sufficient legitimacy. Explanations and justifications for executive power include the need to craft delicate compromises for a diverse nation, complex leadership selection mechanisms that deter challenges of party leaders, and the historically high turnover of MPs and shortage of veteran parliamentarians, even in cabinet. The recent overthrow of Prime Minister Jean Chretien by Paul Martin shows executives are not invincible, but it remains to be seen how Martin will address what he has called a ‘democratic deficit’ in executive–legislative relations in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it