The no-wait two-machine flow shop scheduling problem with convex resource-dependent processing times
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We extend the classical no-wait two-machine flow shop scheduling problem to the case where job-processing times are controllable through the allocation of a common, limited and nonrenewable resource. Our objective is to simultaneously determine the sequence of the jobs and the resource allocation for each job on both machines in order to minimize the makespan. By using the equivalent load method to obtain the optimal resource allocation on a series-parallel graph, we reduce the problem to a sequencing one and show that it is equivalent to a new special case of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). We prove that although the reduced problem forms a subclass of the TSP on permuted Monge matrices, it is still strongly NP-hard. We provide an approximation result and present three special cases which are polynomially solvable. We have also tested two different subtour-patching heuristics in large-scale computational experiments on randomly generated instances of the problem. Both heuristics produced close-to-optimal solutions in most cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it