MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972672034 · doi:10.1002/pen.20259

Temperature control in injection molding. Part II: Controller design, simulation, and implementation

2004· article· en· W1972672034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDecoupling (probability)Temperature controlModel predictive controlThermalInjection molding machineMolding (decorative)Materials scienceController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceControl (management)Control engineeringEngineeringComposite materialThermodynamicsMoldArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a new approach for temperature control of an injection molding machine (IMM) that uses a model predictive control (MPC) strategy. The control system consists of a number of single‐input‐single‐output model predictive controllers, each associated with a particular temperature zone. What distinguishes this approach from others is how the MPC strategy exploits knowledge of temperature interaction between adjacent zones and the effects of back pressure, to develop individual temperature controllers for each zone. This is achieved by decoupling the interaction between zones. The new thermal controller was simulated and implemented with good results on a 150‐tonne IMM using a series of comparative experiments. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:2318–2326, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it