A Shared Binding Site for NAD<sup>+</sup> and Coenzyme A in an Acetaldehyde Dehydrogenase Involved in Bacterial Degradation of Aromatic Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The meta-cleavage pathway for catechol is a central pathway for the bacterial dissimilation of a wide variety of aromatic compounds, including phenols, methylphenols, naphthalenes, and biphenyls. The last enzyme of the pathway is a bifunctional aldolase/dehydrogenase that converts 4-hydroxy-2-ketovalerate to pyruvate and acetyl-CoA via acetaldehyde. The structure of the NAD (+)/CoASH-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase subunit is similar to that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, with a Rossmann fold-based NAD (+) binding site observed in the NAD (+)-enzyme complex [Manjasetty, B. A., et al. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 6992-6997]. However, the location of the CoASH binding site was not determined. In this study, hydrogen-deuterium exchange experiments, coupled with peptic digest and mass spectrometry, were used to examine cofactor binding. The pattern of hydrogen-deuterium exchange in the presence of CoASH was almost identical to that observed with NAD (+), consistent with the two cofactors sharing a binding site. This is further supported by the observations that either CoASH or NAD (+) is able to elute the enzyme from an NAD (+) affinity column and that preincubation of the enzyme with NAD (+) protects against inactivation by CoASH. Consistent with these data, models of the CoASH complex generated using AUTODOCK showed that the docked conformation of CoASH can fully occupy the cavity containing the enzyme active site, superimposing with the NAD (+) cofactor observed in the X-ray crystal structure. Although CoASH binding Rossmann folds have been described previously, this is the first reported example of a Rossmann fold that can alternately bind CoASH or NAD (+) cofactors required for enzymatic catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".