MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972740834 · doi:10.1049/ip-rsn:20000492

Modulation identification of digital signals by the wavelet transform

2000· article· en· W1972740834 on OpenAlexaff
K. C. Ho, W. Prokopiw, Y.T. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Radar Sonar and Navigation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency-shift keyingWavelet transformWaveletDiscrete wavelet transformStationary wavelet transformModulation (music)Computer scienceIdentification (biology)Second-generation wavelet transformHarmonic wavelet transformWavelet packet decompositionSIGNAL (programming language)Speech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)Electronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsTelecommunicationsAcousticsChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringDemodulationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a need, for example in electronic surveillance, to determine the modulation type of an incoming signal. The use of the wavelet transform for modulation identification of digital signals is described. The wavelet transform can effectively extract the transient characteristics in a digital communication signal, yielding distinct patterns for simple identification. Three identifiers for classifying PSK and FSK, M-ary PSK and M-ary FSK are considered. Statistics for hypothesis testing are derived. When the carrier-to-noise ratio is low, the symbol period and synchronisation time are needed to improve identification accuracy. A method for estimating them from the wavelet transform coefficients is included. The performance of the identifier is investigated through simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations230
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - Radar Sonar and NavigationSame topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207