MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973058040 · doi:10.1002/mop.27621

Miniaturization and isolation improvement of a multiple‐patch antenna system using electromagnetic bandgap structures

2013· article· en· W1973058040 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiniaturizationMicrostrip antennaMicrowavePatch antennaMicrostripOptoelectronicsAntenna (radio)Coupling (piping)Photonic crystalMaterials scienceOpticsElectrical engineeringEngineeringElectronic engineeringAcousticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, a compact multielement antenna system composing of microstrip patch antennas is designed by using electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structures. Two distinct EBG structures are designed to achieve the two objectives of miniaturization and suppression of interelement coupling due to surface waves in a multiantenna system. By embedding an EBG array operating in the slow‐wave region, the area of the microstrip patch antenna is reduced by 67.48%. To alleviate the resulting increased back radiation, a second EBG structure is designed to surround the miniaturized patch antenna and close to 8 dB improvement in the front‐to‐back lobe ratio is achieved. As well, the second EBG design is included in a 2 × 2 multiantenna system to suppress interelement coupling. It is found that the coupling is reduced significantly when utilizing the proposed EBG rings. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55:1609–1612, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.27621

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it