MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973133578 · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.013409

Nonadiabatic tunnel ionization: Looking inside a laser cycle

2001· article· en· W1973133578 on OpenAlexaff
G. L. Yudin, Misha Ivanov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsIonizationQuantum tunnellingLaserAtomic physicsField (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)Quasistatic processPhase (matter)Function (biology)Quantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanicsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We obtain a simple closed-form analytical expression for ionization rate as a function of instantaneous laser phase $\ensuremath{\varphi}(t),$ for arbitrary values of the Keldysh parameter $\ensuremath{\gamma},$ within the usual strong-field approximation. Our analysis allows us to explicitly distinguish multiphoton and tunneling contributions to the total ionization probability. The range of intermediate $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\sim}1,$ which is typical for most current intense field experiments, is the regime of nonadiabatic tunneling. In this regime, the instantaneous laser phase dependence differs dramatically from both quasistatic tunneling and multiphoton limits. For cycle-averaged rates, our results reproduce standard Keldysh-like expressions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations493
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207