MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973133578 · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.013409

Nonadiabatic tunnel ionization: Looking inside a laser cycle

2001· article· en· W1973133578 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsIonizationQuantum tunnellingLaserAtomic physicsField (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)Quasistatic processPhase (matter)Function (biology)Quantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanicsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We obtain a simple closed-form analytical expression for ionization rate as a function of instantaneous laser phase $\ensuremath{\varphi}(t),$ for arbitrary values of the Keldysh parameter $\ensuremath{\gamma},$ within the usual strong-field approximation. Our analysis allows us to explicitly distinguish multiphoton and tunneling contributions to the total ionization probability. The range of intermediate $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\sim}1,$ which is typical for most current intense field experiments, is the regime of nonadiabatic tunneling. In this regime, the instantaneous laser phase dependence differs dramatically from both quasistatic tunneling and multiphoton limits. For cycle-averaged rates, our results reproduce standard Keldysh-like expressions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it