MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973150357 · doi:10.4031/002533202787913387

Underwater Archaeology in Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Lake Huron—Preliminary Results from a Shipwreck Mapping Survey

2002· article· en· W1973150357 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dwight F. Coleman

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Technology Society Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsSonarUnderwaterOceanographyThunderSinkholeBayGeological surveyGeologySide-scan sonarArchaeologyHeadlandUnderwater archaeologyBedrockArcticBathymetryKarstShoreGeographyPaleontologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Off northeastern Lower Michigan, the bottom waters of Lake Huron in the Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary and Underwater Preserve (TBNMS/UP) contain a vast array of historic shipwrecks representing more than a century of early Great Lakes shipping. During June 2001, in collaboration with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the State of Michigan, the Institute for Exploration (IFE) mapped a large portion of “Shipwreck Alley”, which extends throughout the deep-water portion of the Sanctuary and continues farther north. Seventeen shipwrecks, two of which are new discoveries, and many other interesting lakebed features were acoustically imaged and carefully surveyed using a high-frequency side-scan sonar towfish. In addition, a number of submerged sinkholes and lakebed pockmarks were discovered and mapped. These karst features in the limestone bedrock were exposed subaerially from about 10000 to 8000 years ago, when the lake level was substantially lower following the last glacial maximum. The archaeological significance of these sinkholes, the newly discovered shipwrecks, and several other promising sonar targets will be evaluated when IFE returns to TBNMS/UP in 2002. Using a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) and an advanced underwater imaging platform, we will visually survey the most important sites, collect high-definition underwater video, and ground-truth sonar targets. The work will be performed by marine geologists in collaboration with underwater archaeologists and maritime historians. This effort is part of a long-term scientific, educational, and public outreach project in the TBNMS/UP supported by NOAA's National Marine Sanctuary Program and Office of Ocean Exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Technology Society JournalSame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207