Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous Evolutionary Computations (EC) software tools are now publicly available to the community - see for instance [1] and [2] for a listing of the most well known. The majority of these tools are specific to a particular EC flavor, however, only a few are truly generic EC softwares [3]. The highly diverse and adaptable nature of Evolutionary Algorithms (EA) make generic EC software tools a must-have for rapid prototyping of new approaches. As we all know, EC comprises a broad family of techniques where populations of solutions to problems are represented by some appropriate data structures (e.g. bit strings, real-valued vectors, trees, etc.) on which variation operators (e.g. mutation, crossover, etc.) are applied using iterative algorithms inspired from natural evolution. Different fitness measures can also be used, with one or several objectives, and it is possible to coevolve several species of solutions, with different species represented by possibly different data structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it