MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973411587 · doi:10.1042/cs20090310

Dining in with BCL-2: new guests at the autophagy table

2009· review· en· W1973411587 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Science · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagyNeurodegenerationCell biologyUbiquitinBiologyApoptosisProgrammed cell deathULK1OrganelleCatabolismNeuroscienceMetabolismBiochemistryDiseaseGeneMedicineInternal medicineProtein kinase A

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BCL-2 homologues are major regulators of apoptosis and, as such, play an active role in the survival of adult neurons following injury. In recent years, these proteins have also been associated with the regulation of autophagy, a catabolic process involved in the recycling of nutrients upon starvation. Basal levels of autophagy are also required to eliminate damaged proteins and organelles. This is illustrated by the accumulation of ubiquitin-positive aggregates in cells deficient in autophagy and, in the nervous system, this is associated with progressive cell loss and signs of neurodegeneration. Given the importance of both apoptosis and autophagy for neuronal survival in adult neurons, understanding how BCL-2 homologues co-ordinately regulate these processes will allow a better understanding of the cellular processes leading to neurodegeneration. In the present review, we will discuss the roles of BCL-2 homologues in the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy, focussing on their impact on adult neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it