MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973442596 · doi:10.1145/568438.568441

Review of <b>Data Structures and Algorithms in Java (2nd ed)</b>

2001· article· en· W1973442596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGACT News · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceJavaObject (grammar)Class (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)AlgorithmGarbage collectionData structureSequence (biology)Linked listProgramming languageInformation retrievalArtificial intelligenceGarbage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data Structures is a first book on algorithms and data structures, using an object- oriented approach. The target audience for the book is a second-year CS class introducing fundamental data structures and their associated algorithms. This second edition of the book has been corrected and revised, and is a substantial improvement over the first edition. A companion web site contains useful ancillary tools, including an excellent set of slides.Despite several minor errors and some questionable stylistic choices, I found this version of the book to be well-written. The problem sets are large, interesting, and thought-stimulating. In several places connections are drawn between the algorithm being discussed and important contemporary real-world problems (e.g. search engines, DNA sequence comparison, garbage collection), which students usually appreciate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it