MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973478317 · doi:10.1152/jn.01010.2003

Spastic Long-Lasting Reflexes of the Chronic Spinal Rat Studied In Vitro

2004· article· en· W1973478317 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Li, Philip J. Harvey, X. Li, David J. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflexStimulationSpasticitySpinal cordMedicineAnesthesiaNeuroscienceH-reflexSpasticWithdrawal reflexTonic (physiology)AnatomyPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the months following sacral spinal cord transection in adult rats, a pronounced spasticity syndrome emerges in the affected tail musculature, where long-lasting muscle spasms can be evoked by low-threshold afferent stimulation (termed long-lasting reflex). To develop an in vitro preparation to examine the neuronal mechanisms underlying spasticity, we removed the whole sacrocaudal spinal cord of these spastic chronic spinal rats (>1 mo after S(2) sacral spinal transection) and maintained it in artificial cerebral spinal fluid in a recording chamber. The ventral roots were mounted on monopolar recording electrodes in grease, and the reflex responses to dorsal root stimulation were recorded and compared with the reflexes seen in the awake chronic spinal rat. When the dorsal roots were stimulated with a single pulse, a long-lasting reflex occurred in the ventral roots, with identical characteristics to the long-lasting reflex in the awake spastic rat tail. The reflex response was low threshold (T), short latency, long duration ( approximately 2 s), and enhanced by repeated stimulation. Brief high-frequency stimulation trains (0.5 s, 100 Hz, 1.5 x T) evoked even longer duration responses (5-10 s), with repeated bursts of activity that were similar to the repeated muscle spasms evoked in awake rats with stimulation trains or manual skin stimulation. Stimulation of a given dorsal root evoked long-lasting reflexes in both the ipsilateral and contralateral ventral roots. Long-lasting reflexes did not occur in the sacrocaudal spinal cord of acute spinal rats (S(2) transection), which is similar to the areflexia seen in awake acute spinal rats. However, long-lasting reflexes could be made to occur in the acute spinal rat by altering K(+) (7 mM) or Mg(2+) (0 mM) concentrations, or by application of high doses of the neuromodulators norepinephrine (NE, >20 microM) or serotonin (5-HT, >20 microM). In chronic spinal rats, much lower doses of these neuromodulators (0.1 microM) enhanced the long-lasting reflexes, suggesting a denervation supersensitivity to 5-HT and NE following injury. Higher doses of NE or 5-HT produced a paradoxical inhibition of the long-lasting reflexes. The high dose inhibition by NE was mimicked by the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist clonidine but not the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor agonist methoxamine. In summary, the sacral spinal in vitro preparation offers a new approach to the study of spinal cord injury and analysis of antispastic drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207