MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973805387 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2013.6810600

Spline Probability Hypothesis Density filter for nonlinear maneuvering target tracking

2013· article· en· W1973805387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilter (signal processing)Kernel adaptive filterSpline (mechanical)Computer scienceMonte Carlo methodAlgorithmNonlinear filterGaussianProbability density functionFilter designDegeneracy (biology)Adaptive filterControl theory (sociology)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionStatisticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Probability Hypothesis Density (PHD) filter is an efficient algorithm for multitarget tracking in the presence of nonlinearities and/or non-Gaussian noise. The Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) and Gaussian Mixture (GM) techniques are commonly used to implement the PHD filter. Recently, a new implementation of the PHD filter using B-splines with the capability to model any arbitrary density functions using only a few knots was proposed. The Spline PHD (SPHD) filter was found to be more robust than the SMC-PHD filter since it does not suffer from degeneracy and it was better than the GM-PHD implementation in terms of estimation accuracy, albeit with a higher computational complexity. In this paper, we propose a Multiple Model (MM) extension to the SPHD filter to track multiple maneuvering targets. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the new filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it