MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GRADIENT-DEPENDENT CONSTITUTIVE LAWS FOR A MODEL OF MICROCRACKED BODIES

2012· article· en· W1973852034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConstitutive equationClassification of discontinuitiesCauchy elastic materialEquivalence (formal languages)Classical mechanicsDeformation (meteorology)Statistical physicsMechanicsMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisFinite element methodPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to propose nonlocal constitutive laws for a model of microcracked bodies. To do so, we use a multiscale approach: we call macroscopic the description in which the body is considered as a continuum and we refer to the microscopic scale when a crack is studied at a closer view. We first propose an approximation of the stress and strain fields in the vicinity of a crack, considering the neighboring discontinuities. We then use equivalence principles between micro- and macroscopic scales in order to determine the expression of the macroscopic constitutive assignments of the body. The latter are written not only in terms of the local values of the deformation and the local values of the geometrical variables representative of the crack field, but also in terms of their gradients. Numerical implementations are performed; we compare constitutive laws obtained from local and nonlocal approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it