MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973919754 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2011.2133930

An Efficient Algorithm for Focus Measure Computation in Constant Time

2011· article· en· W1973919754 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputationFocus (optics)Measure (data warehouse)AlgorithmComputer scienceOrientation (vector space)Filter (signal processing)Linear filterComputer visionConstant (computer programming)Artificial intelligenceImage processingMathematicsImage (mathematics)GeometryOpticsData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents an efficient algorithm for focus measure computation, in constant time, to estimate depth map using image sequences acquired at varying focus. Two major factors that complicate focus measure computation include neighborhood support and gradient detection for oriented intensity variations. We present a distinct focus measure based on steerable filters that is invariant to neighborhood size and accomplishes fast depth map estimation at a considerably faster speed compared to other well-documented methods. Steerable filters represent architecture to synthesize filters of arbitrary orientation using a linear combination of basis filters. Such synthesis is helpful to analytically determine the filter output as a function of orientation. Steerable filters remove inherent limitations of traditional gradient detection techniques which perform inadequately for oriented intensity variations and low textured regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it