Global hypothesis testing for high‐dimensional repeated measures outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-throughput technology in metabolomics, genomics, and proteomics gives rise to high dimension, low sample size data when the number of metabolites, genes, or proteins exceeds the sample size. For a limited class of designs, the classic 'univariate approach' for Gaussian repeated measures can provide a reasonable global hypothesis test. We derive new tests that not only accurately allow more variables than subjects, but also give valid analyses for data with complex between-subject and within-subject designs. Our derivations capitalize on the dual of the error covariance matrix, which is nonsingular when the number of variables exceeds the sample size, to ensure correct statistical inference and enhance computational efficiency. Simulation studies demonstrate that the new tests accurately control Type I error rate and have reasonable power even with a handful of subjects and a thousand outcome variables. We apply the new methods to the study of metabolic consequences of vitamin B6 deficiency. Free software implementing the new methods applies to a wide range of designs, including one group pre-intervention and post-intervention comparisons, multiple parallel group comparisons with one-way or factorial designs, and the adjustment and evaluation of covariate effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.051 | 0.146 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".