Twentieth Century Music and the Question of Modernity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 See, for instance, Edward Said, ‘Interview’, Diacritics 6/3 (1976), 47.2 Robert P. Morgan, Twentieth-Century Music: A History of Musical Style in Modern Europe and America (New York: Norton, 1991).3 Jacques Attali, Noise: The Political Economy of Music. Translation of Bruits: Essai Sur L'économie Politique De La Musique (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1977; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985, 1997).4 Quoted by de la Fuente from Luciano Berio Two Interviews, ed. David Osmond-Smith (New York: Marion Boyars, 1983).5 Quoted on p. 81 from John Rockwell, All American Music: Composition in the Late Twentieth Century (New York: Da Capo Press, 1997).6 Weber quoted on p. 82.7 Karlheinz Stockhausen, Stockhausen—Festival of Hits (LP 2538 152, Deutsche Grammophon, 1974).Additional informationNotes on contributorsChristina GierChristina Gier is Assistant Professor of Musicology at the University of Alberta. She researches gender and music in various twentieth-century musical contexts. She is currently working on a book project about the musical practices of American civilians and soldiers during the First World War. Christina has also published articles on the modernist aesthetics of Alban Berg and his ideas about gender discourse in fin-de-siècle Vienna. Her articles appear in the Journal of Musicological Research, Women and Music, and Musica Humana, in the book Anxiety Muted (Oxford University Press, 2012) and in a German collection on music's function during the First World War. Email: cgier@ualberta.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it