MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975249829 · doi:10.1109/wowmom.2010.5534962

Design and evaluation of a fast authentication scheme for WiFi-based wireless networks

2010· article· en· W1975249829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkRoamingComputer scienceHandoverWireless networkAuthentication (law)WirelessComputer securityTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WiFi-based wireless networks are important components in next generation mobile heterogeneous networks, as WiFi devices are widely used in laptops, PDAs and other mobile computing machines. During the movement, mobile clients have to switch their associated access points because the wireless transmission range is limited in a WiFi network. The process of switching access points is called handoff. Handoff management is a key service in mobile networks, because providing seamless roaming in wireless networks is mandatory for supporting realtime applications in a mobile environment, such as VoIP, online games, and eConference. Many solutions have been introduced to reduce MAC layer handoff latency; however, these solutions do not consider secure authentications, which would not be suitable for real scenarios. During the handoff procedure, mobile clients should pass the authentication to prevent security attacks. In this paper, we propose a fast authentication scheme for WiFi networks to reduce authentication latency during the handoff. In the meanwhile, the packet loss ratio is also minimized to support seamless roaming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it