MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975571598 · doi:10.7202/038860ar

Le silence des pères au principe du « récit de filiation »

2010· article· fr· W1975571598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes françaises · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article porte sur l’un des traits majeurs des récits de filiation, mis en évidence par chacun d’eux ou presque. Il s’agit du défaut de transmission dont les écrivains présents, ou leurs narrateurs, s’éprouvent comme les victimes. Dans L’orphelin de Pierre Bergounioux, La marque du père de Michel Séonnet, Je ne parle pas la langue de mon père de Leïla Sebbar, Atelier 62 de Martine Sonnet et Le jour où mon père s’est tu de Virginie Linhart, les narrateurs font l’expérience majeure d’une déliaison , s’éprouvent comme orphelins et manifestent par là même une lucidité particulière envers leur situation historique , lucidité qui affecte le processus d’écriture, la matière et la manière des textes. Ces récits de filiation seraient ainsi, dans une époque en déshérence, la réponse littéraire à l’égarement de notre temps. Si nombre de romans contemporains s’élaborent sur une nostalgie du romanesque, ils semblent s’être engagés, dans leur modestie même, à renouer les fils distendus de la communauté.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it