MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975686539 · doi:10.4304/jcm.7.1.28-38

Low-Overhead Dynamic Sampling for Redundant Traffic Elimination

2012· article· en· W1975686539 on OpenAlexaff
Emir Halepovic, Carey Williamson, Majid Ghaderi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Communications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceByteRedundancy (engineering)Network packetOverhead (engineering)Data redundancyThroughputTraverseSampling (signal processing)AlgorithmReal-time computingComputer networkDetectorComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract—Protocol-independent redundant traffic elimination (RTE) is an "on the fly " method for detecting and removing redundant chunks of data from network-layer packets traversing a constrained link or path. Efficient algorithms are needed to sample data chunks and detect redundancy, so that RTE does not hinder network throughput. A recently proposed static algorithm samples chunks based on highly-redundant trigger bytes observed in data content. While this algorithm is fast, it requires pre-computed traffic information for the configuration of its static parameters, and it tends to either under-sample (reducing byte savings) or over-sample (increasing processing cost) on heterogeneous traffic. We propose a dynamic sampling algorithm for redundant content detection. Our algorithm is adaptive and self-configuring, and can precisely match the specified sampling rate. Furthermore, it offers byte savings comparable to the static algorithm, with very low additional processing overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207