MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975686539 · doi:10.4304/jcm.7.1.28-38

Low-Overhead Dynamic Sampling for Redundant Traffic Elimination

2012· article· en· W1975686539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Communications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceByteRedundancy (engineering)Network packetOverhead (engineering)Data redundancyThroughputTraverseSampling (signal processing)AlgorithmReal-time computingComputer networkDetectorComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract—Protocol-independent redundant traffic elimination (RTE) is an "on the fly " method for detecting and removing redundant chunks of data from network-layer packets traversing a constrained link or path. Efficient algorithms are needed to sample data chunks and detect redundancy, so that RTE does not hinder network throughput. A recently proposed static algorithm samples chunks based on highly-redundant trigger bytes observed in data content. While this algorithm is fast, it requires pre-computed traffic information for the configuration of its static parameters, and it tends to either under-sample (reducing byte savings) or over-sample (increasing processing cost) on heterogeneous traffic. We propose a dynamic sampling algorithm for redundant content detection. Our algorithm is adaptive and self-configuring, and can precisely match the specified sampling rate. Furthermore, it offers byte savings comparable to the static algorithm, with very low additional processing overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it