MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975713207 · doi:10.1093/imamat/hxt022

A quasi-linear Schrodinger equation for large amplitude inertial oscillations in a rotating shallow fluid

2013· article· en· W1975713207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Applied Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplitudeJacobian matrix and determinantNonlinear systemPhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisNonlinear Schrödinger equationSchrödinger equationBurgers' equationGravitational singularityInertial waveMathematicsWave propagationQuantum mechanicsMechanical waveApplied mathematicsLongitudinal wave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper derives a 2D, quasi-linear Schrödinger equation in Lagrangian coordinates that describes the effects of weak pressure gradients on large amplitude inertial oscillations in a rotating shallow fluid. The coefficients of the equation are singular at values of the gradient of the wave amplitude that correspond to the vanishing of the Jacobian of the transformation from Lagrangian to Eulerian coordinates, but solutions do not appear to form singularities dynamically. Two regimes of high and moderate nonlinearity are identified, depending on whether or not phase differences in the components of the amplitude gradient are required to maintain a non-zero Jacobian. Numerical simulations show that moderately nonlinear solutions of the quasi-linear Schrödinger equation behave in a qualitatively similar way to solutions of a linear Schrödinger equation, whereas highly nonlinear solutions generate rapidly oscillating, small-scale waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it