MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975730686 · doi:10.1108/ijicc-05-2014-0020

Regularized machine learning through constraint swarm and evolutionary computation applied to regression problems

2014· article· en· W1975730686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTikhonov regularizationRegularization perspectives on support vector machinesComputer scienceMathematical optimizationRegularization (linguistics)Backus–Gilbert methodEvolutionary algorithmSwarm behaviourPenalty methodArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsInverse problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the applicability of swarm and evolutionary techniques for regularized machine learning. Generally, by defining a proper penalty function, regularization laws are embedded into the structure of common least square solutions to increase the numerical stability, sparsity, accuracy and robustness of regression weights. Several regularization techniques have been proposed so far which have their own advantages and disadvantages. Several efforts have been made to find fast and accurate deterministic solvers to handle those regularization techniques. However, the proposed numerical and deterministic approaches need certain knowledge of mathematical programming, and also do not guarantee the global optimality of the obtained solution. In this research, the authors propose the use of constraint swarm and evolutionary techniques to cope with demanding requirements of regularized extreme learning machine (ELM). Design/methodology/approach – To implement the required tools for comparative numerical study, three steps are taken. The considered algorithms contain both classical and swarm and evolutionary approaches. For the classical regularization techniques, Lasso regularization, Tikhonov regularization, cascade Lasso-Tikhonov regularization, and elastic net are considered. For swarm and evolutionary-based regularization, an efficient constraint handling technique known as self-adaptive penalty function constraint handling is considered, and its algorithmic structure is modified so that it can efficiently perform the regularized learning. Several well-known metaheuristics are considered to check the generalization capability of the proposed scheme. To test the efficacy of the proposed constraint evolutionary-based regularization technique, a wide range of regression problems are used. Besides, the proposed framework is applied to a real-life identification problem, i.e. identifying the dominant factors affecting the hydrocarbon emissions of an automotive engine, for further assurance on the performance of the proposed scheme. Findings – Through extensive numerical study, it is observed that the proposed scheme can be easily used for regularized machine learning. It is indicated that by defining a proper objective function and considering an appropriate penalty function, near global optimum values of regressors can be easily obtained. The results attest the high potentials of swarm and evolutionary techniques for fast, accurate and robust regularized machine learning. Originality/value – The originality of the research paper lies behind the use of a novel constraint metaheuristic computing scheme which can be used for effective regularized optimally pruned extreme learning machine (OP-ELM). The self-adaption of the proposed method alleviates the user from the knowledge of the underlying system, and also increases the degree of the automation of OP-ELM. Besides, by using different types of metaheuristics, it is demonstrated that the proposed methodology is a general flexible scheme, and can be combined with different types of swarm and evolutionary-based optimization techniques to form a regularized machine learning approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it