MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975860492 · doi:10.1002/bip.20776

A message from the president of the American Peptide Society

2007· article· en· W1975860492 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jane V. Aldrich

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopolymers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicScience Education and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary sciencePolitical scienceCharterWeb siteChemistryPeptideSociologyLawBiochemistryComputer scienceWorld Wide WebThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On behalf of my fellow officers and councilors of the American Peptide Society, I am very pleased to welcome you to the 20th American Peptide Symposium. The American Peptide Society was founded in 1990 as the result of the rapid growth of peptide-related research. The Society is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing and promoting knowledge of the chemistry and biology of peptides and proteins. A major component of this charter is the biennial symposium. Emanuel Escher, Bill Lubell and their associates have organized an exciting program for us based on the theme “Peptides for Youth”. Membership in the Society offers several benefits including a print and electronic subscription to our Society's official journal, Biopolymers (Peptide Science). The journal publishes both original articles and reviews covering all aspects of peptide science. Eminent peptide scientists Lila Gierasch and Charles Deber serve as the journal editor and current trends editor, respectively, and they welcome your manuscript submissions. Members also receive discounts on other journals related to the peptide field, including Chemical Biology & Drug Design, International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics, and several journals from Bentham Science Publishers, and other special discounts on software, etc. The latest information on American Peptide Society activities, developments in peptide science, and member benefits may be found on the Society's continually evolving web site (www.ampepsoc.org). Free professional position and resume posting is also offered at the site. Through the membership of the American Peptide Society in the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB), our members have a strong voice advocating for support of biomedical research plus have access to additional individual benefits (see the FASEB website www.faseb.org for details). The Society also maintains relationships with all of the other regional peptide societies; representatives of these societies will be meeting during the Symposium to discuss ongoing activities. The American Peptide Society strongly believes in supporting the young scientists entering our field. Reduced membership rates for students and postdoctoral fellows are provided, as well as reduced rates to attend the Symposium. Travel grants to attend the Symposium have been provided to qualified students and postdoctoral fellows. Our Symposium will highlight the research of these scientists through both the Young Investigator Mini-Symposium (sponsored by the ESCOM Science Foundation and Amgen) and the Young Investigator Poster Competition (sponsored by CS Bio). Awards for best presentations will be offered in both of these events. Two of our young investigators from the mini-symposium will be chosen to receive Bert Schram Young Investigator Awards. New this symposium, the seven finalists from the Young Investigator Poster Competition will compete for the top prizes in Peptide Idol. The Society is proud to administer several awards, including the prestigious R. Bruce Merrifield Award which is presented at the Symposium. We are pleased to announce that Isabella Karle is the recipient of this year's Merrifield Award for her pioneering development of a method to determine the molecular structures of small molecules by X-ray analysis and for innovative studies on peptide conformation. In closing, I thank all of you who were involved in planning, organizing, and providing support for the Symposium and all who are making scientific contributions and providing exhibits. Your hard work and dedication promise to make this a very stimulating and rewarding week. Enjoy the meeting and your stay in Montreal!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0120.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopolymersSame topicScience Education and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207