An integrated vehicle dynamic control strategy for three-wheeled vehicles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three-wheeled vehicles can address many congestion, parking and pollution issues associated with urban transportation. Previous studies about control of dynamics of three-wheeled vehicles mostly focus on roll dynamics control. This study considers simultaneous control of roll and yaw dynamics. For this purpose, an integrated system has been developed to coordinate active front steering, direct yaw moment control and active tilt systems. The challenges in the control system design arise in finding a compromise between improving vehicle dynamic behaviour and minimizing the actuators’ torque requirements. This study first introduces the vehicle model and then, using optimal control theory, develops an integrated control strategy that works based on the feedback signals from the vehicle’s state variables and the steering input feed-forward. Using a comprehensive nonlinear model, the simulation results illustrate considerable improvements in vehicle handling through the integrated control system in comparison with the pure active front steering, direct yaw moment control or active tilt systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it