Dynamic adaptive bacterial foraging algorithm for optimum economic dispatch with valve-point effects and wind power
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a dynamically adapted bacterial foraging algorithm (BFA) to solve the economic dispatch (ED) problem considering valve-point effects and power losses. In addition, wind power is included in the problem formulation. Renewable sources and wind energy in particular have recently been getting more interest because of various environmental and economical considerations. The original BFA is a recently developed evolutionary optimisation technique inspired by the foraging behaviour of the Escherichia coli bacteria. The basic BFA has been successfully implemented to solve small optimisation problems; however, it shows poor convergence characteristics for larger constrained problems. To deal with the complexity and high-dimensioned search space of the ED problem, essential modifications are introduced to enhance the performance of the algorithm. The basic chemotactic step is adjusted to have a dynamic non-linear behaviour in order to improve balancing the global and local search. The stopping criterion of the original BFA is also modified to be adaptive depending on the solution improvement instead of the preset maximum number of iterations. The proposed algorithm is validated using several test systems. The results are compared with those obtained by other algorithms previously applied to solve the problem considering valve-point effects and power losses in addition to wind power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it